Businesses Breeders Classifieds Forums Photos Chat News Video Features Events Clubs Books
Reptile & Amphibians Insects Birds Cats Dogs Exotics Horses Aquaria Ponds PetHobbyist PetPress PetSupport RescueNetwork My Account
auctions - advertising rates - site news - help - contact

Looking for a pet? Try a rescue first! Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Columbia Fed. St. of Micronesia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Marshall Islands Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota N. Mariana Islands Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Palau Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Alberta British Columbia Labrador Manitoba Newfoundland New Brunswick Nova Scotia Nunavut Northwest Territories Ontario Prince Edward Island Quebec Saskatchewan Yukon Territories Other click here to add your rescue

Weekend Chats: Saturday 9 PM ET Dogs, Dogs, and More Dogs Sunday 10 PM ET The Bull Pen

Posted by KingAndysDad on January 28, 2003 at 07:15:17:

In Reply to: aggressively revaccinating.... posted by LisaT on January 28, 2003 at 00:31:58:

Three years seems to be currently the safest protocol and is what I follow. It sounded like you were one of those people that advocate not vaccinating at all. If you do, as you say, follow the research, then you know the incidence of adverse effects with vaccines is extremely low.

Follow Ups:

• what I do know... LisaT 01/28/03 (2)
  • Based on what evidence? KingAndysDad 01/28/03 (0)
  • should have added LisaT 01/28/03 (0)
• Re: Agreed annual vs three year vaccinations Lynn 01/28/03 (0)